beta
Text
1. On July 10, 2019, the Defendant received the registration office of the Seoul Western District Court on the real estate stated in the attached list from the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and
2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);
1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings between the Plaintiff, Defendant D, E, F (16), G (24), H, I, J, K, K, L, M, N, andO. The remaining Defendants are deemed to have led to confession under Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act.
A. Seoul Mapo-gu P and Q lot owners removed the apartment houses on the above ground on June 2003, and then form an association for the purpose of a reconstruction project to newly build a new apartment house (hereinafter “instant association”), and entered into a reconstruction project agreement with the Defendant R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “S”).
The main contents of the above reconstruction project are that the S has constructed an officetel with only the prescribed contributions from the site necessary for the implementation of the project as a reconstruction project implementer and only the prescribed contributions from the members of the rebuilding project, and then the general portion of the housing except the portion of the housing units sold on behalf of the members and the construction cost is appropriated
B. On June 28, 2003, S obtained a building permit for an officetel (hereinafter “instant officetel”) comprised of “Defendant T and 47 persons (as Defendant 1,6-48, 64, U,V, and W, Defendant B falls under the owner as Defendant No. 19)”, “Seoul Mapo-gu X, Y, P, Q, and Z” as the site. U and C were co-owners of the said Y and Z site, and Defendant C did not participate in the said redevelopment project. Since the above X site was excluded from the said redevelopment project, the name of the owner of the building on September 9, 2005 was changed to “Defendant T and 45 (except for the above X-E co-owner of the site)”.
On April 12, 2004, Defendant R R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “A”) completed the instant officetel on November 2, 2009, following the status of S under the above reconstruction project agreement.
(e) AB association shall be part of its members.