1. As to each 1/46 shares of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 list, the Defendants listed in the column for the transferor listed in the separate sheet No. 4 shall be the Defendants.

1. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings between the Plaintiff, Defendant E, F, G (16), H(24), I, J, K, L, M, N,O, and P. The remaining Defendants are deemed to have led to confession under Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act.

A. On June 2003, Seoul Mapo-gu Q and R land owners removed the apartment houses on the above ground, and then form an association for the purpose of a reconstruction project to newly build a new apartment house (hereinafter “instant association”), and entered into a reconstruction project agreement with the Defendant Samsung Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “T”).

The main contents of the above reconstruction project are that T is a reconstruction project operator who constructed an officetel with only the prescribed contributions from the site necessary for the implementation of the project as a member, and then the general sale except the members' share is sold on behalf of the above members and the construction cost is appropriated from the sale price.

B. On June 28, 2003, T obtained a building permit for an officetel consisting of “Defendant U and 47 (including Defendant 1,6-48, 64, 5, W, and X)” and “Seoul Mapo-gu Y, Z, Q, R, and AA” (hereinafter “instant officetel”). V and Defendant D were co-owners of the said Z and AA site, and Defendant D did not participate in the said reconstruction project. (c) Since the instant Y site was excluded from the said Y site, the owner of the building on September 9, 2005 changed the name of “Defendant U and forty-five (excluding W, X, a co-owner of the said Y site)”. D.

On April 12, 2004, the "AB" corporation AB operated by the defendant S, followed the status of T in the above reconstruction project agreement and continued the business, and completed the instant officetel on November 2, 2009.

E. The Dongwon-dong Saemaul Bank received the decision of provisional disposition prohibiting the disposal of real estate against each of the households of the instant officetels on the ground that the right to claim the registration of the establishment of additional establishment against some of its members is the preserved right.