logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.22 2016나2429
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part written in the report (1) is replaced by the "statement of calculating the amount of damages" in part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance in the corresponding table as follows.

(2) Once the fourth decision of the first instance is rendered, the following parts shall be applied:

“B. Future Medical Expenses: 3,474,00 won requirements (b) (inasmuch as there is no evidence that the chest of the two sides is due to the instant accident, it shall be deemed to have been disbursed on June 15, 2016 on the day following the date of closing argument in the trial for the convenience of calculation.

ii) Doese

3. In conclusion, the defendant is liable to the plaintiff for damages equivalent to 111,190,385 won of insurance proceeds equivalent to the damages in this case and 96,190,385 won of property damages from September 11, 2010, the date of the accident in this case, which is 96,190,385 won of property damages, to the plaintiff, until July 22, 2016, which is the date of the ruling of the court of first instance, where it is deemed reasonable that the defendant's dispute over the existence or scope of the defendant's obligation to pay damages, the consolation money shall be 15,00,000 won from September 111, 2010 to December 22, 2015, which is the date of the ruling of the court of first instance where it is reasonable to dispute about the existence or scope of the obligation to pay damages in this case, and as such, the plaintiff's claim for damages in this case shall be dismissed within the scope of the plaintiff's damages.

arrow