All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact-misunderstanding (Defendant A) did not act in collusion with B and C as “AB” from June 2014 to July 2015, Defendant A did not act as a broker for sexual traffic, etc. (Article 1677 criminal facts of the 2016 senior group). Moreover, Defendant A conspired with E to act as a broker for sexual traffic, etc. (Article 1677 criminal facts of the 2016 senior group) and did not act as a broker for sexual traffic, etc. (Article 1677 criminal facts of the 2016 senior group 1677).

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentence (defendant A: one year and two months of imprisonment; two years of probation observation; community service order80 hours; Defendant H: one year of imprisonment; two years of probation observation; one year of probation observation; one year of probation; two years of probation observation; and one year of probation; two years of probation observation; two years of protection observation; and one year of probation observation; and Defendant I: ten months of imprisonment; two years of probation observation; and 80 hours of community service order) are too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court and the first instance court, Defendant A conspired with B and C to act as “AB” from June 2014 to July 2015, and it can be recognized that Defendant A committed an act, such as arranging sexual traffic, in collusion with E, and that Defendant A committed an act, such as arranging sexual traffic, in collusion with E during the first police officer from January 2015 to February 2015. Thus, Defendant A’s assertion of mistake is rejected.

1. E is hospitalized in the pertinent CS hospital in the prior week, and Defendant A has invested money with Defendant A’s hospital and operated a vegetable B and C sexual traffic business establishment. The C does not pay the profit normally but pays only the amount of her week.

Although they are within the same age, they cannot be trusted as they are.

In addition, the operation status, earnings, etc. of the business establishment are different as they are working as employees of the business establishment in the astronomic't know about their lives.