Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months and by imprisonment for six months, respectively.

However, as to Defendant B and C, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce, mediate sexual traffic, or mediate sexual traffic, such as sexual intercourse or similar intercourse, in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables or other property gains from unspecified persons.

Nevertheless, Defendant A, as the main business owner of “G SP, shall exercise overall control over the store management, etc., Defendant B, as the main office manager of the above business establishment, is in charge of customer guidance and collection affairs, and Defendant B, as the offense of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging 4804 High Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 201Hun-Ga, Seoul High Court Decision 2017, Oct. 13, 2017, sentenced to imprisonment for six months, suspension of execution two years, and 80 hours of community service order, and the above judgment was finalized on October 21, 2017;

Defendant

C as the head of night office of the above business establishment, was sentenced to a judgment sentencing a fine of KRW 3 million on October 13, 2017 due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, including the Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts"), and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 21, 2017.

As an employee, there was a public invitation to conduct cleaning and diameter as an employee.

Accordingly, Defendant A and Defendant B conspired with Defendant A and Defendant B from May 16, 2017 to June 27, 2017; Defendant C, from June 10, 2017 to June 27, 2017, in collusion with each other (H from June 5, 2017 to June 27, 2017; and I, from June 24, 2017 to June 27, 2017, each conspired with each other; and I, from June 24, 2017 to June 27, 2017 to operate commercial sex acts with the trade name “GSP” on the first floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul High Court, Gangnam-gu, to find out an unspecified number of male customers who had been receiving KRW 1216-160,00 to June 16, 20, and to provide them with guidance to the said customers inside the room.

The K and L had female employees engage in sexual intercourse or similar sexual intercourse with the above customers.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1..