1. The Intervenor’s motion for the Intervenor’s participation is permitted.

2. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

3...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. 1) The Intervenor is entitled to a housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter “instant project”) with a total of 31,766 square meters of land outside Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, and 157 square meters of land.

(2) In order to implement the project, the Plaintiff (designated parties; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is the owner of a detached house located in the project area of the instant case, and the Selection D (hereinafter “Selection”) together with the Plaintiff is each owner of a detached house located in the project area of the instant case and of the Eunpyeong E-gu Seoul E-type and its ground building (hereinafter “the instant building”) located in the project area of the instant case, and both the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff are the co-members of the Intervenor.

B. On May 21, 2015, an intervenor established a management and disposal plan and obtained authorization from the defendant on May 21, 2015, and received an application for parcelling-out from its members based on the project implementation authorization. The plaintiffs filed an application for parcelling-out to the intervenors in the status of the owners of each of the above detached houses. 2) The defendant formulated a management and disposal plan with the purport of selling multi-family housing subject to parcelling-out as each of the instant projects (hereinafter “instant management and disposal plan”), and obtained authorization from the defendant on March 15, 2018.

(hereinafter “instant authorization disposition”). C.

1) On November 21, 1981, the main purpose of the building ledger of the instant building is “house”. From November 21, 1981 to November 21, 1981, the selector has been engaged in the business of manufacturing assembly metal products in the name of “F” without undergoing a separate procedure for alteration of the purpose of use as stipulated in Article 19 of the Building Act (hereinafter “instant business”).

2) As the Intervenor did not reach an agreement on the business loss compensation (including relocation expenses) of the instant case between the designated parties, the Intervenor filed an application for adjudication with the Seoul Regional Land Tribunal.