logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.02.15 2018가단519942
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant B and C shall have the real property listed in paragraph 1 of the attached Table;

B. The defendant C is in accordance with the attached list No. 2.

Reasons

1. Claim against Defendant B, C, E, F and Defendant (Appointed Party G) G and Appointor H

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a Housing Redevelopment and Development Project Association established with the land size of 1,22,489 square meters in Suwon-si, Suwon-si as a project implementation district. 2) The Plaintiff obtained the authorization of the establishment of the association on December 17, 2010 from the Suwon-si, the authorization of the project implementation plan on June 29, 2016, and the authorization of the management and disposal plan on August 25, 2017, respectively, and the same Suwon-si Mayor announced the management and disposal plan authorized.

3) Defendant B and C are real estate in the attached list No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) located in the project implementation district.

Defendant C is the co-owner of the instant building located within the project implementation district. Defendant C is the owner of the instant building located within the instant project implementation district. Defendant F is the owner of the instant building located within the instant project implementation district. Defendant F is the owner of the instant building. The said Defendants did not apply for parcelling-out to the Plaintiff and became a subject of cash liquidation. 4) The Appointed became the owner of the instant building located within the project implementation district and became a subject of cash liquidation because he did not apply for parcelling-out to the Plaintiff as the owner of the instant building No. 6 in the instant project implementation district. Defendant G (Appointed Party) is the son of the Appointed H, and occupies the entire second floor of the said building (the instant

5) The Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation because it did not reach an agreement with the said Defendants and the designated parties H, who are subject to cash settlement. On October 1, 2018, the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal decided on November 15, 2018 the date of commencement of expropriation and rendered adjudication of expropriation on each of the above real estate owned or occupied by the said Defendants and the designated parties H and the Defendant (Appointed Party) G (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”).

(6) According to the instant expropriation ruling, the Plaintiff: (a) KRW 90,559,540 for Defendant B on November 9, 2018; (b) KRW 300,582,690 for Defendant C; and (c) KRW 252,331,10 for Defendant F; and (b) KRW 390,201,10 for Selection; and (c) KRW 103,90,000 for Defendant E on November 14, 2018, respectively.

arrow