[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On December 28, 2019, at around 01:35, the Defendant destroyed the property damage by making the victim D, in the frequency operated by the victim D in Suwon-gu, Busan, U.S., the Defendant destroyed by making the slid, where the market price of the victim’s ownership is unknown, in the course of E and time off, on the ground that the slided off fell under the partitions.

B. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant, at the time and place stated in the above paragraph (a) above, expressed the victim’s desire to take the victim out of the restaurant, and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 15 minutes by leaving the victim’s failure, such as pushing the victim out of the restaurant, and pushing the victim.

C. On December 28, 2019, at around 01:55, the Defendant damaged public objects by means of arresting a police officer dispatched after receiving a report of 112 prior to the said frequency as a flagrant offender and holding the front seat of the patrol vehicle F5, which was parked at the same time, in which he was arrested as a flagrant offender, the Defendant destroyed the objects used by public offices by cutting off the metal partitions installed at the said patrol vehicle, and making the metal partitions installed at the said patrol vehicle open.

2. On December 28, 2019, at around 01:55, Defendant B arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender at a slope group G belonging to the Busan Southern Police Station, the Busan Southern Police Station, which was called for after receiving a report from the Defendant, to a slope group G belonging to the Fdistrict of the F Zone of the F Zone of the Busan Police Station, which was called for, and arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender, Defendant B committed assaulting the Defendant’s body to take off the said G group’s body in his/her hand before the patrol.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ written statements of the police concerning G of their respective legal statements are investigated and reported to the police officers who suffered damage to the obstruction of the performance of official duties.