Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On March 4, 2015, around 23:34, 2015, the injured Defendant sought dancing with the injured party G (Woo, 33 years of age) and D, but, on the ground that the said injured party and D refused to do so, performed an act, such as displaying a bridge toward D’s chest, but was able to receive a claim from the said injured party and D, and was led from the stairs of the above main entrance entrance, led the victim G to take the head of the said victim’s head and the entrance to the entrance, leading the victim G to the two skins of the number of days of treatment.

B. On March 4, 2015, at around 23:55, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the acts such as the above paragraph (a) from the Ganjin Police Station Hamjin-gu, Seoul, who was called on the street before the above Fju's store, and from the HJ, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of performance of official duties. As the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender from the police officers, the Defendant sent the above I and J her a bath theory that "this Chewing Chewing" was sent to the police officers, and the J's chest was feld one time by drinking, and the I was sealed by both hands.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

2. On March 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender with the same injury as the description of paragraph (1) in front of the Fju on the street, at around 23:55, the Defendant 2: (b) laid the Defendant into the driver’s seat of the patrol vehicle in order to prevent the arrest of the Defendant; (c) sealed the Defendant’s chest on several occasions; (d) pushed the Defendant’s hand; and (e) pushed the Defendant’s chest.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement to G, D, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (Investigation of CCTV video data at aF point);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendants: The Defendants’ obstruction of performance of official duties under Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and imprisonment.