A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:00 on March 4, 2013, the Defendant submitted a land-based written consent to the public official who is a public official in charge of the construction disaster prevention and civil engineering belonging to the above Gun office at the Yong-Gun Office located in Young-gun, Young-gun, Young-gu, Yongnam-gun, and the public official in charge of civil engineering belonging to the above Gun office.

On March 5, 2013, at around 10:30, the Defendant requested C to return the above land-based consent submitted by C on the ground that the land compensation is less than the amount of land compensation at the construction disaster prevention office and office of the above Yongama Military Administration, but C refused this.

At around 11:00 on the same day, the Defendant purchased one liter of a width equivalent to one liter at the page of the trade name “E” located near the above Yong-Gun Office for the purpose of making fire to the above Young-Gun Office, and purchased a disposable base at the convenience store located near it.

At around 11:25 on the same day, the defendant found it as the office for the prevention of the construction of the Yongama-Gun Office and received a land-based written consent from C as to whether the defendant opened a lid from the city to the end of the city.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a public building, has prepared a fire prevention against the above Yeongdeungpo-gun Office office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. On-site and new width photographs, new widths and CCTV data and photographs, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (where a report is accompanied by the 112-Report processing table), investigation report (where CCTV is established at the G convenience store), and investigation report;

1. Articles 175 and 165 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation, etc. Act

1. The alleged defendant merely uses a stopner to receive a return of the land-based written consent by threatening C, and did not intend or purpose to prevent fire.

2. The following circumstances are acceptable by each evidence mentioned above.