1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the judgment is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the court of first instance citing the same (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da42068, Apr. 1, 200).

【The part written by the court 【The facts stated above are the same as in the above-mentioned provision’ of 6th one.

7 19 to 8-5 pages shall be dried up to the following parts:

As seen earlier, the instant contract was concluded on June 27, 2013, and the instant contract term was six months from the date of the contract. However, according to the aforementioned evidence and the statement in Gap's evidence Nos. 5, 17, and 18, the Defendant received a request from the head of Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Office for supplementation and correction of civil petition documents, such as "the submission of the letter of designation of the owner of J co-owner's share and road register" on September 30, 2013, the Plaintiff supplemented the said civil petition documents on behalf of the Defendant; the Defendant obtained a building permit from the head of Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City branch office on January 14, 2014, and received notification that a building commencement report was processed on July 4, 2014."

Of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the scope of the obligation to pay penalty of 4.4." (the portion between 14 and 15.10 pages) shall be as follows:

4. Scope of liability to pay penalty;

A. The plaintiff's assertion does not exceed Article 13 (1) of the contract of this case.