Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of ruling;
A. The Plaintiff was running a motor vehicle transport brokerage business for moving freight in the name of “C” at a store located within B’s ground (hereinafter “instant place of business”) in Silung-si, the Plaintiff was running the motor vehicle transport brokerage business.
(b) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: Private investment project (D; hereinafter “instant project”) - Defendant: the E public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on March 25, 201, published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 12, 201, and published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on January 16, 201;
C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on January 18, 2013 - Compensation for losses: Not recognizing the Plaintiff’s business losses, but calculating KRW 6,900,000 as relocation expenses for obstacles within the instant business site - The date of commencement of expropriation: February 18, 2013.
The Central Land Tribunal's ruling on August 22, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "adjudication") - Contents of the ruling: The plaintiff's assertion of business losses is not accepted, and the obstacles claimed by the plaintiff are already reflected in the evaluation, and the cost of relocating facilities is increased to 7,050,000 won - An appraisal corporation: A new appraisal corporation in the future of a corporation, a stock company, and a stock company - No. 1, 2, and 1 through 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) respectively, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The assertion and judgment
A. In calculating the Plaintiff’s compensation for losses, the main appraisal of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff omitted the interior expenses of the facilities such as floor cement construction, water supply and drainage facilities, floor construction, interim partitions construction, sliding construction, floor-to-sliding construction, floor-to-sliding construction, floor heat-to-sliding, electric temperature-to-sliding, drawing and charging, and tamping construction, which are installed within the instant business site, from the subject of the compensation for losses, and excessively low the relocation expenses. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s compensation for the loss should be increased. The Plaintiff’s relocation of the business site due to the instant business suspension.