1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants ordering payment in excess of the amount ordered below.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the underlying facts is as follows: (a) except for the fact that “29.3 square meters” as stated in the third letter of the judgment of the court of first instance is “39.3 square meters”; and (b) it is identical to the corresponding column in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it as it is by the main sentence of

2. Determination

A. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this part is as follows: (a) the following is determined as to the assertion that Defendant A, B, C, and K non-insurance added or emphasized the following matters in the first instance judgment; (b) the above part is as stated in the column for the first instance judgment, except for the addition to the following paragraphs (4) and (5) (3); and (c) the above part is as stated in the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. In light of the above, the above part is as follows: (a) the leased contract between Defendant C and the leased contract between Defendant A and the leased contract between Defendant A are all identical to the beauty room; (b) the whole leased area of the first instance floor is 17.6 square meters; (c) the size of the leased area of the leased area of the second floor is 110 square meters (the area of the leased area for common use only 47.47 square meters; and (d) the area of the leased area of the leased area for public use or 137 square meters (the area of the leased area of the leased area for public use) is 3638 square meters (the area of the above).