logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2017.07.13 2016가합5517
분양대금 반환청구 등
Text

1. Defendant J shall: (a) KRW 111,323,16 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 111,323,160 to Plaintiff C and D; and (c) KRW 111,323,160 to Plaintiff C and D.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant J newly constructed and sold M building L in the original city L (hereinafter “instant building”) and owned each section of exclusive ownership on the second and sixth floors of the instant building.

B. The Plaintiffs concluded a sales contract with Defendant J for each part of exclusive ownership of the first floor of the instant building with the following content (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant sales contract”).

According to the instant sales contract, the Plaintiffs paid the sales price in full to Defendant J and completed the registration of ownership transfer.

The selling price (excluding a site area) of the object of sale in lots (excluding Plaintiff A) is 3.64,890 square meters of 40.67 square meters of 57.67 square meters of 40.67 square meters of 39,489,090, Plaintiff BO's exclusive area of 37.06 square meters of 37.87 square meters of 39,326,400 value-added tax of 39,326,400, Plaintiff CD P head of 393,264,264,000 of 37.37.64,37.64,264,000 of value-added tax of 39,37.64,264,326,400, Plaintiff E Q head of 537.64,000 square meters of 37.74,000 square meters of 47.64,000 square meters of public building area of 537.40

C. Defendant K is running Lestop in the name of W by leasing Nos. 5 of the second floor of the instant building from Defendant J.

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 22 (if there are additional numbers, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims against defendant J

A. The parties’ assertion 1) The Plaintiffs’ primary claims were concluded with Defendant J.

arrow