The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Of the fact-finding, misunderstanding of legal principles, the part of the loan amount of KRW 20 million as of January 10, 2020 and KRW 80 million as of January 15, 2020, among the facts of fraud No. 1-Ga fraud of the judgment below as of January 10, 2020, the Defendant lent KRW 150 million to the victim E on February 10, 2020, while the Defendant lent KRW 150 million to the victim E on or around February 10, 2020, the Defendant paid off the above KRW 80 million, which he borrowed from the victim, and subsequently lent only the remaining KRW 70 million to the victim. Thus, there was a intention for repayment.

In addition, at the time when the defendant borrowed the above KRW 80 million from the victim E, the defendant introduced the land located in Ischeon-si (700 square meters) to Q around November, 2019, and was entitled to receive KRW 150 million from Q as a fee. In fact, Q used Q to lend KRW 150 million to the victim E through the above, so there was a capability to repay.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that recognized the intention of defraudation against the defendant is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts and legal principles.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실 오인, 법리 오해 주장에 관한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들과 그에 의하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피고인은 피해자 E가 피고인의 주선에 따라 F로부터 2억 원을 사업자금으로 빌리자마자 며칠 사이에 그 중 1억 원을 선이자 및 차용금 등 명목으로 다시 가져갔는데, 피해자가 수사기관에서 한 일관되고 구체적인 피해 진술에 의하면, 피고인은 F로 부터의 사업자금 2억 원 차용 당일 선이자 (2,000 만 원) 내지 나중에 줄 돈 (2,000 만 원) 이라는 식으로 피해자를 윽박질러 4,000만 원을 송금 받아 가져갔고, 2020. 1. 15. 나중에( 일주일 또는 열흘 안으로) 1억 원으로 갚겠다며 6,000만 원을 빌려 갔는데, 이후 피해 자가 위 2020. 1. 15. 자 6,000만 원 입금이라도 F에 대한 채무를 납부한...