logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.01 2012가합67615
국가배상청구권 및 특별 손해배상
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a representative of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment (hereinafter "the apartment in this case") and a person who served as a representative of the council of occupants' representatives and a general director, and the defendant E is a person who served as a representative of the 112 Dong and auditor of the council of occupants' representatives of the apartment in this case. The defendant B, C and D are police officers belonging to the G Police Station.

B. Defendant E and H, the representative of the council of occupants' representatives 110 Dong Dong-dong of the instant apartment, visited each household unit of the instant apartment 109 units to dismiss the Plaintiff from the Dong representative position, and received the written consent to dismiss the Plaintiff from the 109 Dong residents, and then received the written consent to dismiss the Plaintiff on August 7, 2009. However, the Plaintiff’s written consent to dismiss the Plaintiff due to the failure to meet the quorum was returned.

C. At around 9:00 on August 10, 2009, six members including Defendant E and the above H were found to be the management office of the apartment of this case and requested that the above additional written consent was received by the council of occupants' representatives as of August 7, 2009, and they were not complied with by the I et al.

원고는 위와 같이 피고 E 등이 관리사무소에서 관리사무소 직원에게 항의하고 있다는 사실을 알게 되자 2009. 8. 10. 10:48경 112신고센터에 ‘엊그제 파벌싸움으로 사건 현장에 무서워 들어갈 수 없으니 같이 동행하여 달라’는 내용으로 신고하였다.

Police Officers K and L, who were called upon the Plaintiff’s report, listened to the Plaintiffs’ statements and returned to the Plaintiff after having the Plaintiff submit a written complaint.

Then, when the plaintiff reported again to the 11:20 reporting center, the above police officers K and L were dispatched to the above police officers, and the plaintiff entered the apartment management office of this case at around 11:30 along with the plaintiff and entered the apartment of this case at around 11:30, not an unconditional arrest to the plaintiff who is investigating the parties to this case and requesting the arrest of the defendant E, and the subsequent written

arrow