beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant Gold Industry Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 831,601,123 and its related thereto, from August 21, 2014 to May 1, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties is an autonomous organization organized by the occupants in order to manage the 828 teaching houses and the 276 households and ancillary facilities (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”). The non-party’s workplace housing association (hereinafter “the non-party’s workplace housing association”) is the executor who constructed and sold the apartment of this case, and the defendant Geum Ho Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Geum Ho Industrial”) is the company that constructed the apartment of this case by being awarded a contract from the non-party’s association for the construction of the apartment of this case.
B. The Defendant Gold Industrial Co., Ltd., which entered into a warranty contract, entered into each of the warranty contracts (hereinafter “each of the warranty contracts of this case”) with respect to the instant apartment as indicated below with the Defendant Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Housing Guarantee”), and was issued a warranty from the Defendant Housing Guarantee.
Since then, the guarantee creditor of each guarantee contract of this case was changed to the plaintiff in the old market.
Serial No. 10121209-201-003201 from April 30, 2009 to April 29, 2010, 389,713,764 20121209-201-201-003202 from April 30, 2011 to April 29, 2011, 389,713,764 301209-201209-2001-2003003,003203 from April 30, 2009 to April 29, 2012:
C. The apartment of this case was inspected on April 21, 2009, and the apartment of this case was inspected on the use of the apartment of this case. The defendant Geum Ho industry failed to construct the apartment of this case according to the design drawing, or modified the construction differently from the defective construction or design drawing. 2) Accordingly, the plaintiff continues to repair the defects to the defendant Geumho industry from September 8, 2009 at the request of the tenant of this case and the sectional owner.