1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

. notified.

On the other hand, on February 26, 2013, D, an employee of the Plaintiff, requested the Defendant Company to make an estimate by changing the size of the exposed concrete board to 50T in the course of negotiating transaction terms with E, the representative director of the Defendant. Accordingly, the Defendant drafted a quotation with the amount of the same day to KRW 65,077,806 (Evidence 3 of A = 7).

D was signed by E in the said quotation (Evidence A 3) on the job.

Then, around 14:46 on February 28, 2013, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a statement of transaction amounting to KRW 66,056,146, by facsimile. The said statement of transaction was written in 100T, and the unit price was KRW 21,50,000, total area of KRW 25,398,595.

The plaintiff pointed out that the above transaction statement contains wrong specification on 100T, and the defendant sent to the plaintiff a statement of transaction statement on March 4, 2013, stating that the size of the exposed concrete board is “t* non-satise” by facsimile around March 15:54.

(The defendant's production and the plaintiff's refusal to receive the plaintiff's production on February 27, 2013. On February 27, 2013, the production of the panel, etc. started and finished on the following day at the plaintiff's request. Among them, the exposed concrete panel's size was 100T products.

On March 5, 2013, the Plaintiff received contact from the Defendant that all of the ordered goods were produced, and transferred the remainder of KRW 56 million to the Defendant on March 5, 2013, and went to the Defendant to deliver the following goods.

In that place, the plaintiff was delivered with the main body among the goods ordered by the plaintiff, but the exposed concrete board rejected the receipt on the ground that the size is not 50T but 100T, unlike the order of the plaintiff.

Even after the plaintiff's replacement production, the defendant refused to supply the exposed concrete board size 50T, and the contract corresponding to that part is concluded.