A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant works in the Korea Kwikset Holdings from October 2012 to May 2014, 2014, and in the Korea Kwikset Holdings from May 2014 to November 2014, respectively. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of identifying customers and collecting money from the Korea Kwikset Holdings.

On the other hand, Mekset Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of Kwikset Service and Mekset Holdings, which received the major business assets of the above Korea Kwikset Holdings.

The Defendant began to work for the Korea Kwikset Holdings Co., Ltd., and borrowed advance payment from the company to pay child support to the former place, and went through economic difficulties, such as paying personal debt, etc. Therefore, the Defendant arbitrarily changed the deposit account from the company’s customer to use it as an individual by receiving a substitute payment from the company’s customer.

1. On October 27, 2014, the Defendant entered “B” in the column for registration number of the applicant and the name column of the applicant and the applicant for the transaction kept at the 158 ambro dong-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul at the 158 ambro Do-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. The Defendant affixed the seal impression of the applicant for the transaction at the ambro 44-0261” in the ambro 261-81-10193, “261, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, and the resident (business operator)’s (business operator) address column, “69201, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, and “B” in the amb phone column, and affixed the seal impression of the Mabro Mabro Mabro Mabro Mabro.

After that, the Defendant submitted a forged application for trading to C, who is an employee of the said Nonghyup Bank branch, who is aware of the forgery, as above, as if the application was duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights, the Defendant forged one copy of the transaction application form in the name of Messenger Co., Ltd., which is a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised it.

2. The Defendant’s occupational embezzlement is the agricultural cooperative established as set forth in paragraph 1 above.