logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.02.11 2018누73197
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case by the court of the first instance as to this case is the same as the part of the first instance judgment in addition to the following parts: therefore, it shall accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(A) The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if all evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined, the first instance court’s rejection of the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). The second instance judgment of the first instance court in the second instance in the second instance of the second instance in the 5th term “Gland bus van” was replaced by “Gland bus.”

In the second sentence of the judgment of the first instance, as of May 19, 2017, “B” as of January 10, 2018, May 13, 2017, and “B” as of January 10, 2018. In the third sentence of the first instance judgment, “Sawon District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch 2018No332 in the second sentence of the second sentence, the appellate court was sentenced to a judgment of dismissal on November 28, 2018, and the final judgment of dismissal was made on January 31, 2018, which became final and conclusive,” and Article 135 of the Enforcement Rule of the former Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security No. 4513, Apr. 28, 2019, 2013”.

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow