Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On September 17, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court on September 17, 201, and a fine of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Pyeongtaek District Court on October 19, 201.

Nevertheless, on March 25, 2014, around 20:40, the blood alcohol concentration of 0.12% (the result of measurement) was driven by a vehicle for the use of the C rocketing for the use of the vehicle owned by the person himself/herself from the shot apartment 104-ro, Suwon-si, Howon-si, Howon-si, Howon-si, Howon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement of the person involved in the D traffic accident;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. 주취운전자적발보고서 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음의 사정 즉 ① 사고 경위 및 직후 차량의 이동에 관한 피고인의 경찰진술문 : 사고로 인한 소리가 쿵하고 났으면 두 대의 차량 중 한 대는 분명 움직인 것이 맞나요.

The answer: One of the two parties is clearly learning and the accident occurs.

The text: It is essential to say that two vehicles were left away after the accident.

Answer: G not. G not.

At the time of the proposal, there was a distance of about 50 centimeters from the beginning.

Note : Summary of a statement that is not attached

The answer: It was made far from the beginning.

The other party refers to a false representation.

If so, it is necessary that the other party should have re-expose the vehicle after the accident.

The answer: It has not been deemed that the other party is driving.

There is no difference that the difference will be deducted in the future.

It is contradictory, ② The police and the legal statement of D on vehicle movement are consistent and specific, ③ The defendant is only the accident after the accident.