1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion

A. The Plaintiff was the Defendant in a criminal case of Seoul Western District Court 2014 high-priced 208, and the Defendant testified as follows with respect to the prosecutor’s question as follows in the above case, but it is a false statement contrary to the facts (i.e., perjury).

[ Strategy] (At this time, the prosecutor presented a written statement to the witness and read the contents thereof) / [brupt] : C has written a written statement. It is essential that the content itself talks about the witness's situation and witness's witness's witness's witness's witness's witness's witness's witness's witness's interview C, and signed the witness's witness's statement.

The answer: The witness held that on May 7, 2013, a male in the vicinity of the "D" where he/she was working at Abane at night on May 7, 2013 and around September 9, 2013, he/she is leading to him/her while taking the hand of a female.

The answer: Examples, I consider.

It is essential to say that there was a fact that the female has escaped from the place where she was sexually fluent, and that the female has been fluenced, and that there was a fact that the female was fluenced by her female again, and that the female was fluenced, etc.

The answer: At the time, women do not have the name of the female, and they seem to have fled and she would drive away the female.

The answer: To example, I will.

【Postmartion】

B. Due to the above perjury by the defendant, the plaintiff suffered disadvantages in the determination or sentencing of innocence or not guilty in the above criminal case, and suffered mental suffering, therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damage.

2. Determination:

A. Whether the testimony of the witness 1 witness in the relevant legal principles is false or false shall be determined by understanding the whole of the testimony in the relevant interrogation procedure as a whole, not a part of the simple part of the testimony, but rather a whole of the testimony in question. If the whole purport of the testimony is consistent with objective facts and it is against memory, it shall be memory as to the minor part of the testimony.