A fine of 5 million won shall be imposed on the crimes of No. 5 of the judgment of the defendant against the crimes of No. 1 to No. 4 of the judgment of the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 7, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on September 1, 2018 at the Suwon District Court, which was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On December 1, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B, “If he/she lends 20 million won to B, he/she will pay interest at the rate of 5% per month, and make payment without mold within a few months.”

However, in fact, while the defendant did not have any property, it was urgent to pay up to 300 million won of the debt, and because the tax of KRW 00 million was in arrears, there was no intention or ability to pay it even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 20 million from the victim on the same day.

2. On November 3, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement in a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, the Defendant concluded that “If the Defendant borrowed a private teaching institute start-up fund, he/she shall pay 5% interest per month, and shall repay it within 2 to 3 months without mold.”

However, in fact, while the defendant did not have any property, it was urgent to pay up to 300 million won of the debt, and because the tax of KRW 00 million was in arrears, there was no intention or ability to pay it even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant, as described in the attached Table (1) from around that time to December 10, 2016, received a total of KRW 76 million through the same eight times, as indicated in the victim’s list of crimes (1), by deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 5 million in cash on the same day from the victim.

3. On October 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If a credit card is lent to the victim, the credit card would be settled without a mold” to the said victim.

However, it is true.