logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.05.13 2013고단749
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 749"

1. Fraud against victim D;

A. A. On May 5, 2008, the Defendant received money from the victim D in the Han-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of borrowing money from the victim D even though it is impossible to know the trade name, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “I will use it only one month if the company’s operating fund is short of 30 million won and will repay it without a mold,” and the Defendant acquired money from the victim for the purpose of borrowing KRW 30,000,000 from the victim to the deposit account in the name of E on June 5, 2008.

B. Around August 2008, the Defendant, at the coffee specialty point where it is impossible to know the trade name in Gangnam-gu Seoul (Seoul), made a false statement, stating that “The Defendant would pay 300,000,000 won including the principal amount of KRW 2,00,000,000, including the amount of KRW 2,000,00,000, which had not been paid after completing the construction if it was short of the construction fund, and would make 1/2 of the profits remaining after selling the her aged, from August 30, 2008 to November 29, 2008, by receiving the victim’s deposit account in the name of a total amount of KRW 30,000,000 from August 30, 2008 to November 29, 2008.

2. The Defendant’s fraud against the Victim G, H, I, J, and K was committed on or around February 7, 201, to N, an agent of the Victim G, a victim G, from February 7, 201, at the Melel site office located L on or around February 7, 201

3. To pay KRW 270,000,000 to the interior decoration work until October 20.

Although the victim entered into a subcontract with the same content, the victim did not have any intention or ability to pay the construction cost even after the completion of the construction work.

After all, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and let the victim do the interior interior interior decoration work at the above site around that time.

arrow