logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.10.28 2014고단3116
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duties of driving CM5 taxis.

On July 20, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi on July 20, 2013:20, and proceeded ahead of the national bank located in 307 as Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, with five-lanes of the five-lanes of the road to the sloping three-lanes of the new direction.

Since signal lights are installed and the left-hand turn or U-turn was a private-distance intersection, there was a duty of care to drive a person engaged in driving duties safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the injured party to turn left on the right side of the course of the defendant's collision by negligence to make a stop signal to turn left in violation of the signal, and caused the victim to turn on the left side of the victim D(39 years old) who turn to the left in accordance with the signals, the left side of the ECA 110 V Maoba to the right part of the defendant's driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the left-hand flag macy that requires medical treatment for about 12 weeks due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on occurrence, actual condition, and supplement statement of D traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) and (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant, in violation of the signal at the intersection, has caused a relatively serious injury to the victim by shocking the victim who was driving an Otoba while leaving the left at the five-lanes of the stop signal. However, the defendant has the reason for sentencing.

arrow