A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 11, 2009, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Seoul Southern District Court of Seoul, a fine of KRW 2.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving), and on February 11, 2014, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 7 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving), etc. on at least two occasions, despite the fact that the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions. However, around 06:07 on February 3, 2018, the Defendant driven a car in the state of drinking alcohol concentration of KRW 0.52% (dacting driving) from the 5km section of alcohol from the roads near the school basin located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Western-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (dacting driving) to the head of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Nowon-do to the 688-do upstream road.

2. On February 3, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (after-accident) driving a Bsch Rexton car under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraph (1) around 06:07, and driving the front road in front of Dongjak-gu Seoul at the locking seat to Kimpo Airport.

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to make a change of course by operating a direction direction when changing the vehicle line and giving prior notice of a change of course and to make a change in the traffic conditions before, after, and after the change.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the left and left while changing the vehicle from the two lanes to the three lanes, and caused the part to be driven by the victim D(43) E in the two lanes, which is driven by the Defendant’s driver’s driver’s driver’s license, behind the part on the front part of the U.S. driver’s driver’s license to the three lanes.

Ultimately, the Defendant, while destroying a low-priced car volume by occupational negligence as above, did not immediately stop the vehicle so that the repair cost would be equivalent to KRW 300,000,000, and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of D traffic accidents;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver in charge and record of drinking;