logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고단4987
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the C representative in Gyeonggi-do, who is engaged in electronic commerce transactions with one full-time employee.

The Defendant did not pay KRW 2,952,472 of D retirement pay from October 3, 2016 to June 7, 2018 at the same place of business within 14 days from the date of retirement, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of will: The proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;

(b) The employee shall express his/her intention not to punish him/her after institution of public prosecution;

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow