logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2020.12.10 2020고정155
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The Defendant, as the representative of Pyeongtaek-si B and fourth floor, is a user who operates beauty business using four regular workers.

Notwithstanding the fact that an employee retires from his/her office within 14 days from the date when the grounds for such payment occurred, the Defendant, who served in the above workplace as of October 16, 2017 through June 30, 2019 and served as retirement allowance of the retired employee D within 6,795,049, and from September 8, 2017 through July 31, 2019, did not pay the retirement allowance of the retired employee E 7,239,60, respectively, within 14 days from the date of the retirement without agreement on the extension of the due date between the parties concerned.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of will: proviso of Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;

(b) The victimized workers indicated in the facts charged shall express their intention not to punish.

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow