The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. A summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant and his defense counsel (misunderstanding of facts)

There is no fact that “A letter of performance” (hereinafter referred to as “each letter of implementation of this case”) was prepared, and D forged a letter of performance.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, thereby misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment below also asserted that the defendant did not prepare a letter of execution of this case, but forged D, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, and the court below rejected the defendant's assertion and found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below and the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., D, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, to the court of the court below, the Defendant was separate from the Defendant on October 1, 2009, after submitting a written divorce for the contents of the agreement to divide the Defendant’s property into documents.

I found at the I workplace, and consistently stated to the effect that the official seal was affixed to each execution letter stating that the Defendant shall be held liable for all of the business funds and repaid the amount of KRW 20 million, and the official seal was affixed to the above execution letter, but the Defendant had affixed the seal affixed to the above execution letter, as it was uneasible on the seal affixed, and thus he had obtained the seal affixed to the seal. ② On October 4, 2013, D filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on the basis of the instant execution letter against the Defendant, Incheon District Court Decision 2013 Ghana 543053, on the basis of each of the instant implementation forms, and on November 28, 2013, the Defendant and D shall pay KRW 7 million to D.