logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.04.13 2018고정73
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A. On September 10, 2017, the Defendant of a private document: (a) the Defendant promised to pay KRW 200 million received from A and C on May 16, 2017 to 17, 2017; and (b) the Defendant signed the Defendant’s signature in each letter of performance in each letter of performance prepared in advance by using a tample to the tample in each letter of performance prepared from May 16 to 2017; and (c) “9,11,11,30” in each letter of performance.

As a result, the defendant forged one copy of the performance letter in the name of the complainant, who is a private document on rights and duties, for the purpose of exercising evidentiary materials favorable to civil litigation with the complainant.

B. On September 10, 2017 and October 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) issued a forged performance statement to an employee who could not know the name of the Changwon District Court branch branch branch in the Changwon-gun, Changwon-gun, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; and (b) exercised the document as if it were duly formed.

(c)

On November 22, 2017, the Defendant submitted a complaint of the lawsuit seeking the return of loans (the Changwon District Court Msan Branch 2017j. 1457) to the effect that “200 million won is to be returned” based on the forged performance statement, such as the above “A”, in the Changwon District Court Masan Branch, which was located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon District Court 2017.

However, the defendant was found to have forged and attempted a letter of performance by the complainant during the trial process.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint and the executive secretary;

1. Relevant Articles 352, 347(1) (the point of attempted fraud) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of intent to commit fraud), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order.

arrow