logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.05.29 2014고단1892
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

Seized cash 147,240 won (No. 2) shall be returned to C by the victim.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 15, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. and two months of imprisonment, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 23, 2010.

"2014 Highest 1892"

1. The Defendant, even though having no occupation or work, did not borrow money from other persons, did not have the ability or intent to repay, with the intention of deceiving apartment security guards to obtain money by means of false words as residents living in apartment units against apartment security guards in order to avoid living expenses necessary for living with the female living together, despite the absence of such intent.

On April 13, 2012, around 14:20 on April 13, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 8,620,000 in total over 85 times from the victim F, who is the above apartment security guard, by falsely stating that “I are residents of this apartment, who are residents of this apartment, and you will promptly get back with the traffic accident, and will pay back. I will have to do so.” The Defendant received KRW 100,000 from the victim, i.e., the borrowed money, from the victim’s seat, from around 14:20 to December 9, 2014, as shown in attached Table 1.

From April 13, 2012 to December 9, 2014, the Defendant acquired 8,620,000 won in total by deceiving the victims on a total of 85 occasions.

"2015 Highest 268"

2. Around May 21, 2013, the Defendant livedd with the victim H at G apartment guard room in the Dongdong-si, the G apartment guard room in the Dong-si, the Defendant would pay the money immediately after the wife lends the money to the Defendant, if he/she borrowed the money to the Defendant from Ulsan to 11 hours at night, because he/she was involved in a traffic accident.

‘Falsely speaking to the effect that ‘’ was false.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a certain occupation and did not borrow money from another person due to lack of work, and did not have the ability to repay, and not only did he did not reside in the above G apartment but there was no traffic accident.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and makes cash on the same day from the victim.

arrow