logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원속초지원 2017.09.21 2015가합300003
사해신탁취소
Text

1. Real estate on August 7, 2013 as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet between the defendant and the corporation D.

Reasons

1. Facts recognized;

A. Judicial reconciliation 1) F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) between the Plaintiff Company and E

) On February 21, 1991, the land and buildings of this case are referred to as “the land and buildings of this case” in the order of the condominiums in attached Table 2(hereinafter referred to as “instant land and buildings”) on the ground in attached Table 1.

(2) When F’s actual managers were detained on suspicion of fraud, G entered into an agreement with F on April 1, 1996, that “G shall resume the construction work for civil engineering and landscaping, the G shall resume the construction work, and the unpaid construction cost shall be paid by July 30, 1996, and if the construction cost by that time is not paid, the name of the owner shall be changed to G.”

3) As F did not pay the construction cost under the above agreement, G discontinued filed a lawsuit against F on January 11, 1997 and filed a lawsuit against F on December 27, 200 to seek the change of F’s name to its owner, and was awarded a favorable judgment on June 27, 2002 (Evidence 14) and E Co., Ltd (hereinafter “E”) (hereinafter “E”) completed the registration of transfer of ownership by winning the auction procedure on May 23, 1997, with the land of this case and the land of this case and the land of this case and the H large 1,170 square meters (hereinafter “H land”).

5) E is the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff Company”) whose representative director was G on July 29, 2004.

B) As to the Plaintiff Company, “E sells the instant land and H land in KRW 1.8 billion, but if the Plaintiff Company fails to pay the land price, the Plaintiff Company and the Plaintiff Company transferred the name of the owner of the instant building and the project approval, and E will transfer 50% of the shares of the Plaintiff Company to the Plaintiff Company.” On the same day, G changed the name of the owner of the instant building to the Plaintiff Company (Evidence 14.6) on March 23, 2006 (Evidence 14.6), and E did not pay the price under the said contract to the Plaintiff Company.

arrow