A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a motor vehicle in B.

On November 14, 2018, the Defendant indicated warning, such as: (a) the victim H(38 years of age) who driven a G Saturdays car and driven it on a three-lane road in the front direction of the Cheongju-si, the petition 2 cycle; (b) the Defendant driven the said car-friendly C, D, E, and F on the two-lane road in the vicinity of the said road; (c) the rapid direction is changed to the right side of the said three-lane and the right side is changed to the right side of the road; and (d) the Defendant displayed a warning on the wind that the victim H(38 years of age), who driven the G Saturdays car and driven it on the right side of the road.

As above, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle at a dangerous level, did the victim's warning behavior. However, from the above point of time, the Defendant continued to drive the motor vehicle from the above point of time to the point of time, followed the above earth car which the victim driven and brought about a rise, etc., and on the same day, around 01:54 on the same day, the Defendant got ahead of the above earth car at the right right side, and shocked the operation seat of the motor vehicle at the above SP car at the above SP car to prevent the front.

Therefore, as the victim of drinking scar car continued to run without stopping the above earth car, the defendant continued to stop the above earth car, and the defendant tried to stop the above earth car, and eventually, around 01:55 on the same day, the part before the driver's seat of the scar car in front of the driver's seat of the above scar car was shocked.

Accordingly, the Defendant, using the car at the above SPP site, which is a dangerous object, suffered the injury of salt and tensions in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time damaged the above SPP car to be repaired in KRW 3,489,792.

The prosecutor prosecuted each of the crimes of this case as substantive concurrent crimes, but one of the crimes constitutes several concurrent crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1..