logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.10 2018고단2535
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2013, the Defendants and the persons infinites submitted necessary documents for loans to financial institutions entrusted with the loan of employee house leasing loan from the Korea Housing Finance Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Housing Finance Corporation”), using the fact that they could easily obtain the loan of the loan of the loan of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the house, and

On the same day, the Defendants, at the “E Authorized Brokerage Office” located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, prepared a lease agreement with Defendant B as the lessor for the F apartment 101 Dong 1203, the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment 101 Dong 1203, and prepared documents necessary for the loan, including a certificate of employment that Defendant A serves as the lessee at that time.

After that, on April 29, 2013, at the point in the Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul National Bank of Korea, the Gangseo-gu, 177, issued a lease agreement and a certificate of employment, and the defendant A submitted the above documents on the same day to the point in the Yeeeedong Station, and applied for a loan of KRW 90,000 of workers' house lease loan amounting to KRW 90,000.

However, the fact that the defendants did not actually lease the above apartment complex, the defendant A did not have served in G, and part of the loan amounting to KRW 90 million from the injured party was divided into the defendant B and the name of the deceased and the remaining loan was planned to be consumed by the defendant A for the opening cost of the business.

From May 8, 2013, the Defendants and persons in unsound name had been paid KRW 90 million as loans to the national bank account (H) in the name of Defendant B around May 8, 2013 from the victim by deceiving the victim as such.

As a result, the Defendants were informed of the victim by deceiving the victim in collusion with the name infinite.

arrow