logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.01.15 2019고단4923
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant became aware of the victim B, non-speeded victim C, and non-speedd victim D at the place where the right to receive the payment is held, such as a person without delay, and the victim E from 2011 to her death, etc., the defendant became aware of.

1. Fraud;

A. On November 2016, the Defendant: (a) organized a ten-wheeled 10 million foot 10,000 foot 10,000 won unit; (b) had the victim D join three-dimensional units; and (c) received KRW 30,000,000 from the victim as the deposit amount for three-dimensional units each month.

In August 2017, the victim demanded that the defendant pay KRW 10 million to the last 10 million unit of the 10 million number of the 3rd unit of the 10 million number he/she joined on November 2016, at a place where it is not possible to know the place, and the defendant made a false statement to the effect that "if he/she loans KRW 10 million to B, he/she shall pay the operating expenses, he/she shall pay the interest, and will pay it later."

However, at the time, the defendant did not have any particular income, and there is no intention or ability to pay the interest on the loan borrowed from other persons only every month, and there is no possibility that he borrowed the money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant obtained consent from the victim to use the Defendant of KRW 10 million at the same time with the number of KRW 10 million on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On March 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would lend money to the victim at the victim D’s house located in the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City F, to the extent that the victim did not have any money,” and that “the Defendant would return money to the Plaintiff by lending it to the pawnpo, if he/she lent it to B, and using it to B, and return it again from the pawnpo by finding it back from the pawnpo by October 2017.”

(b).

arrow