logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.07.11 2014고합53
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(주거침입강간등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault therapy for 40 hours.

(b) the defendant;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is an employee of the EMel in Bupyeong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City D.

피고인은 2014. 3. 8. 04:40경 위 모텔 407호에서 피해자 F(여, 24세)의 남자친구가 먼저 돌아간 후 문이 시정되어 있지 아니한 위 407호에 침입하여 피해자가 알몸인 상태로 혼자 잠을 자고 있는 것을 보고, 바지와 윗옷을 벗고 팬티만 입은 상태에서 피해자의 허벅지를 만지고, 입으로 가슴과 음부를 핥고, 혀를 피해자의 음부 안쪽에 넣고, 손가락을 피해자의 음부 안에 넣었다

The act was repeated.

Accordingly, the Defendant invaded the victim's room in possession, and used the victim's mental condition to commit similar rape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written appraisal;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Selection of Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes; Articles 319 (1), 29, 297-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 47 (1) and 49 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and Articles 49 (1) 2 and 50 (1) 2 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. The scope of applicable sentences: Imprisonment for a period of two years and six months to fifteen years;

2. Type II (the area of recommendation and the scope of recommendation): 5 years to 8 years; and

3. Determination of sentence: The crime of this case with imprisonment for three years is committed by the victim who was under the influence of alcohol due to intrusion upon the room of the guest although the criminal defendant had a duty to protect the guest as the maternity employee.

arrow