The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor for up to six months) of the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant was committed in the course of the instant crime from the investigative agency to the trial, is favorable to the defendant, or that the defendant was punished several times for the same or similar crimes as the instant crime, or that the defendant committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period during which he was convicted of at night residence intrusion larceny and was released from prison, which has not yet been convicted of committing the instant crime; the sentencing of the court below appears to have taken into account the favorable circumstances; the court below did not seem to have any other changes in circumstances that would vary between the court below and the court below; and all other circumstances shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant’s age, character, character and environment, occupation, power, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and circumstances before and after the instant crime, it is not deemed unfair to have imposed the sentence of the court below that sentenced the defendant for six months of imprisonment.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.