logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2021.03.30 2020고단622
중과실치상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for not less than six months and by a fine not exceeding three million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 충남 부여군 B에 있는 피고인의 주거지에서 리트 리버 4마리 {5 년생 2마리( 갑돌이, 갑 순이) 3 년생 2마리( 밤톨이, 산신이) }를 키우며 관리하는 사람이다.

1. On August 17, 2018, the Defendant injured by negligence: (a) around 13:40 on August 17, 2018, went ahead of the house in front of the Defendant’s dwelling.

In such cases, a person who raises a large dog has a duty of care to wear a dog so that he/she does not attack a dog or engage in any dangerous conduct against others, and to manage him/her so as not to cause any safety accident, such as towing a dog.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the management of the dog without wearing a neck on the dog, and the Defendant driving away from the victim C ( South, 75 years old) who was in the front of the mari (marith) in Han Libber, thereby causing the victim to suffer an open room for the victim to the left side of the 10-day medical treatment.

2. Injury by gross negligence;

A. On February 21, 2020, around 18:00, the Defendant opened the Defendant’s residence, opened the above residence door, and collected Libers, thereby doing another work.

The above Libers merely carried out the body or clothes of the village residents who had been living in the vicinity of the defendant three times from May 2019 to May 2019. Moreover, from May 2018 to May 2020, Libers show the tendency of attacking ordinary people, such as leashing to the village residents who had been living in the neighborhood over 11 times during a total of 11 times between May 2018 to May 202. On the other hand, since the Defendant’s dwelling area is a place where the residents pass at the port in the residential area, the Defendant managing Libers above is a place where the residents pass at the port. In such a case, the Defendant, who is obliged to wear a dog to prevent the opening from attacking people or threatening others, and whether the entrance was corrected or not, on the other hand, considered the opening.

arrow