1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, are as stated in the reasoning (including the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, but excluding the corresponding part of the judgment, hereinafter “3. conclusion”), and therefore, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. From July 19, 2015 to July 18, 2017, the term of validity of the Schedule 1 to 2 below the two modified parts, “from July 19, 2015 to July 18, 2017,” which read “factory 2 is excluded,” and “the term of validity”.

The second to the second to the two pages shall put in the order as follows:

The details of the production factory are as follows: (a) the 1 synthetic resin shop in the name of the factory; (b) the door of synthetic resin; (c) the door of synthetic resin factory in the name of the factory; and (d) the 3 synthetic resin factory in the name of the factory in the city where D-4 synthetic resin factory is located in the city where D-7 synthetic resin factory in the city where the 5 synthetic resin factory is held in the city where D-6 synthetic resin factory is located in the city where the 5 synthetic resin factory is held in the city where D-5 synthetic resin factory is located; and (d) the 10 of the 10 of the 10 of the 5-dong factory in the city where G non-dong factory is held in the city where G-dong factory

7. The 7.m. “in fact” is placed on the right side of “in accordance with the latter f,” and the “direct production fulfillment” is added to “in accordance with the latter f.” of the 9.m.

9 The 8th parallel to 5th parallel on the same side shall be as follows:

【Request for the submission of opinions in accordance with the contract termination or sanction (pre-determination) sent to the Plaintiff on March 14, 2017, in light of the legal principles presented by the first instance court cited by the court of first instance, once all the arguments were collected in light of the facts cited by the court of first instance, the Defendant Administrator of the Public Procurement Service refers to the “request for the submission of opinions in accordance with the contract termination or sanction (pre-determination)” (the main text of the Public Notice No. 7, “Evidence No. 7,” refers to the revocation of direct production due to the production of synthetic resin, and the termination of the contract resulting therefrom, and the “direct production confirmation” is revoked as a cause of the disposition in the attached notice