1. The Defendant’s Jeju District Court Decision on December 12, 2013 was based on the Decision 2013Gapo6940 Decided December 12, 2013.

① From May 27, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the exclusion of enforcement force of the final and conclusive judgment indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article (hereinafter referred to as “final and conclusive judgment”), the execution of the instant final and conclusive judgment of KRW 3,596,132 (=the remainder of KRW 2,804,392 enforcement costs79,740) and the remainder of KRW 2,804,392 for KRW 2,804,397 and KRW 2094 and KRW 205 of the final and conclusive judgment of KRW 205 (hereinafter referred to as “final and conclusive judgment of KRW 205”) were sentenced to the final and conclusive judgment of KRW 205 and KRW 294 of the instant final and conclusive judgment of KRW 30,57 and KRW 294 of the instant final and conclusive judgment of KRW 30,975 and KRW 294 of the instant final and conclusive judgment of KRW 205 and KRW 29481 of the instant final and conclusive judgment of KRW 29.301.48.

According to the above facts, since the debts of this case and expenses for its execution are all extinguished or repaid by deposit, compulsory execution based on the final judgment of this case cannot be permitted.