The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is the director of the apartment management office, and the victim B (the South and the age of 57) is the regular company for the installation of apartment facilities, and these are between the two employees of the same company.

At around 09:00 on May 4, 2020, the Defendant, on the ground that he was unable to properly treat the civil petition of residents within the Simpo-si apartment management office in the Simpo-si, Simpo-si, Simpo-si, Simpo-si, on the part of the victim, was sleeping the victim’s breath, and assaulted the victim with drinking as he did.

2. The facts charged of this case cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act as a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.