The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant was dissatisfied with the victim by delaying the payment of tuition fees by the victim during the course of lessons at the E-university music school for the victim’s operation. The fact is that the victim sent to E-university, etc. did not misrepresent himself/herself as a part-time lecturer, C did not teach 50,00 as a part-time lecturer, and C did not teach her as a part-time lecturer at a time and did not observe 1 hour, and C did not have a threat to the victim’s entrance to Daejeon and Chungcheong district universities. Despite the absence of such a threat as not allowing C to take lessons from the victim’s only to enter the school of Daejeon and Chungcheong district on May 8, 2014, the victim did not want to teach 30,000 from the time of lessons to the E-university music school of Daejeon, and the victim did not want to teach 30,000,000 young children from the time of lessons to the said university, and the victim did not want to teach 10,000 young children.

2. Determination is an offense falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the contents of the agreement, it can be recognized that the victim D withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, Criminal Procedure Act.