1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The summary of the case is the case where the plaintiff seeks the payment of KRW 11 billion out of the remuneration in consideration of the consideration for the management of an Astrest, the owner of an Astrest, in accordance with the payment agreement or Article 61 of the Commercial Act (Merchants' right to claim remuneration).

In fact, C was a director of "D" established in New York in 2010 and was appointed as a representative by establishing the Plaintiff Company for the purpose of public performance planning business, etc. on July 23, 2013 after returning to the Republic of Korea.

After graduating from E University Music University in 2008, the Defendant completed the Master's degree course at F University in 2012, the PPPP in 2013, the PPP PP in G in 2014, and passed the doctor's degree course at H University in G in 2014, and is a fluor who has served on the first degree of I Music Scoo in 2006.

The defendant has been engaged in the performance of K, etc. at the stage of F University J members or Solo-ro K, etc. on March 3, 2011, February 2013, and April 2013.

L of the original defendant's contract was prepared in 12,685 US$25,370, such as rental fees, and paid as security deposit, USD 12,685, which is 50% of 25,370, such as rental fees.

When L has revoked the performance plan due to personal reasons and it is difficult for L to confiscate the bond, C who paid USD 4,211.34 out of the above deposit for L was demanded to seek a substitute for compensating for damage.

L, on April 10, 2013, introduced C to the Defendant, who was the master's degree course at F University, and presented M M's rental fee and promotional expenses for M's 9,000 dollars, music expenses for P and Q, and R's budget list (budget No. 3).

L is also to C April 16, 2013.