logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.18 2016가합544295
용역대금
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff’s KRW 203,00,000 and KRW 115,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 88,00,000 from October 16, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff Company is a corporation established to engage in real estate development, building and civil engineering services, etc., and the Defendant Company is a corporation established to engage in housing construction business, etc., which is the implementer of the project to build new apartment complex C in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si (hereinafter “instant project”).

B. Around June 2014, the Plaintiff Company’s representative at the time of the Plaintiff Company’s actual operator and D, (i) requested the Plaintiff Company’s adviser E to provide consulting and financial advice related to the instant business, and (ii) around July 2014, the Defendant Company’s director F to provide the Defendant Company’s Seoul office with the explanation that “the Defendant Company’s name was changed to the Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation (the name of the Defendant Company was changed to the Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation) on March 2014, but was refused to issue a letter of guarantee due to lack of feasibility,” and (iii) around August 2014, G, the president of the Defendant Company, and the Plaintiff Company, “The Plaintiff Company, with respect to the instant business, shall provide consulting, such as supplementing its business plan, so that the Plaintiff Company may enter into a guarantee agreement and guarantee agreement with the Defendant Company, taking into account the financial situation of the Defendant Company.”

C. From the date of the conclusion of the instant service contract to the end of 2014, the Plaintiff Company performed financial consulting services pursuant to the instant service contract (as a result, an application for guarantee was submitted along with the application for business balance analysis, business plan, etc.). The Defendant Company entered into a PF guarantee contract with the Korea Housing Guarantee Corporation on November 12, 2014 and was issued a guarantee.

Article 2 The scope of this service shall, in principle, provide financial advice on the project of this case, and the plaintiff company and the defendant.

arrow