beta
Text
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as the Plaintiff KRW 572,00,000 and the period from January 24, 2018 to November 8, 2018.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. (1) On March 17, 2013, the Plaintiff and D entered into a service contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendants (hereinafter “Defendant C”) with respect to the land owner in the instant project site and the land purchase contract between Seongdong-gu Seoul E and 21 lots (hereinafter “instant project site”), the Plaintiff and D entered into a service contract to pay the Plaintiff the land purchase agency fee.
(2) On January 1, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a service agreement between the Defendant B Housing Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) and the Plaintiff to pay KRW 20 million per parcel to the Plaintiff upon entering into a sales contract with the land owner in the name of the Defendant Association or the designated person of the Defendant Union, Seongdong-gu Seoul Union or the Defendant Union on three parcels outside F in the instant project site, and the Defendant Union entered into a service agreement to pay the Plaintiff KRW 20 million per parcel upon entering into the sales contract.
(3) On July 1, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Association entered into a service contract with the Plaintiff to perform the foregoing duties on the land outside Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul and four parcels located in the instant project site, and the Defendant Union entered into a service contract with the Plaintiff to pay KRW 20 million per parcel upon the conclusion of the sales contract.
(4) On January 1, 2017, the Plaintiff concluded a service agreement with the Defendant Union and the Plaintiff stating that “the Defendant Union shall pay the Plaintiff the service cost of KRW 20 million by lot pursuant to the instant contract for purchase of the instant project site, and the Plaintiff shall pay KRW 300,000 to the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 95% of the purchase of the instant project site.”
(hereinafter referred to as "each service contract of this case" in 2013, 2016, and 2017). (b)
(1) On June 20, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim for service cost with the Defendant Cooperative for the service cost of KRW 132 million (including value added tax) with respect to six cases for which the sales contract for five parcels, including Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seoul, and five parcels, was concluded.