The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) against the Defendant on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, a written application for coal submission filed by a person who is the defendant or a person who seeks the defendant’s preference against the defendant was presented in the trial court, but this does not fall under a special change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the lower court, and there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court, as no new document for sentencing was submitted, and the sentencing reasons revealed in the course of the pleadings of the instant case are considered to be unfair by exceeding the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.