The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) against the Defendant on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, the Defendant’s application was submitted by the first instance court to seek the Defendant’s preference against the Defendant, but this does not constitute a special change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the lower court, and there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court due to the lack of new materials to be submitted, and the sentencing reasons revealed in the course of the argument in this case are comprehensively considered, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable as it goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.