1. The Defendant’s KRW 3970,00 and KRW 20 million among the Plaintiff’s KRW 33970,000 and KRW 13970,000.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded an online advertising agency contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the following contents.

§ 1. The purpose of this Agreement is to prescribe the terms, procedures, and other necessary matters in using the services provided by the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) by the Bank of Bankruptcy (hereinafter referred to as the “Exchange”).

Article 8. Details of the Mexa Service] Contents of the Service provided by the Company are as follows:

The overall marketing business of digital marketing, including off-the-spot/progra, will be conducted on behalf of others, and the services will be provided in accordance with the detailed services specified in the separate quotation form.

Article 9. The fee for the service provided by the company is imposed according to the advertising method chosen by the advertiser.

The amount of settlement, the method of settlement, and the date of settlement for advertising expenses shall proceed through mutual consultation.

Article 1 of the Addenda, the extension of the contract shall be effective for the duration of the contract, and the advertiser and the company shall decide on the extension of the contract after the termination of the contract.

Contract term: June 25, 2015 to November 30, 2015

The instant contract was extended until December 31, 2015, and the Plaintiff performed online advertising services for the Defendant until then.

C. On September 15, 2015, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 55 million as advertising price for the month of September 15, 2015, KRW 37 million as advertising price for September 31, 2015, and KRW 22 million as advertising price for October 30, 2015, respectively.

According to the instant contract, the advertising price for November 2015 is KRW 22 million and the advertising price for December 2015 is KRW 1,3970,000.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 7 and Gap evidence 9, the whole purport of the pleading

2. Assertion and determination

A. (1) The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant asserted is the Plaintiff’s KRW 22 million as advertising price for November 2015, and December 2015.