logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.02.06 2018구합79117
해임처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

A. On January 15, 1993, the Plaintiff was appointed as a public official of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and from July 13, 2015, as a public official of Grade 7 in technical service in the administrative bureau, the Plaintiff was in charge of duties related to public and fixed-term workers, management of entrusted facilities within an arboretum, and maintenance and management of buildings.

B. On December 13, 2017, the First Personnel Committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City recognized that the Plaintiff committed sexual harassment and violated the duty to maintain dignity by making physical contact with the victims working at the same place of business (victim 2 public service workers, victim 4 arboretum workers within the same arboretum) and having them find employment by sending letters to the singing and singing together (victim 3 C workers) while working in the arboretum. It was recognized that the Plaintiff violated the duty to maintain dignity and dignity by making physical contact with the fixed-term workers, public service workers, and carpeters whose status is unstable by taking advantage of the superior and leading position, such as raising their hands on the shoulder of the victims working at the same place of business (victim 2 public service workers, victim 4 arboretumers within the victim 4 arboretum), and that there is no possibility that the Plaintiff will be dismissed by taking disciplinary action on the ground that the Plaintiff's act of sexual harassment was committed against many victims, and that there is no possibility that it would be a need to maintain the public service discipline.

Specific grounds for disciplinary action shall be as follows:

The summary of the grounds for disciplinary action (hereinafter “instant grounds for disciplinary action”): With respect to the victim 2 (D, public service, and 30 years of age at the time) (hereinafter “instant grounds for disciplinary action”): Around February 2016, the victim 2 took the official seal in a glass temperature room, and the victim 2 took a photograph of her left hand and her left hand.

When the victim is refused by the victim, it is from why he or she is a male-child.

arrow