1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant is the owner of the instant forest. 2) The Plaintiff’s husband D purchased the instant forest from a person who cultivated the instant forest at the end of the 1960s and delivered it. However, from the time of delivery to the time of delivery without completing the registration of transfer under D’s name, he did so and cultivated part of the instant forest, such as swimming and going-out, etc., in a part of the instant forest, which is the maximum area that can be cultivated thereafter, and he did so by planting trees in the part inside the instant forest among the instant forest, which is the forest that is the area that can be cultivated thereafter, and occupied the remainder in peace and openly with the intention

In addition, the Plaintiff paid the property tax on the forest land of this case by the year of 2014.

3) Since the Plaintiff occupied, cultivated, and cultivated the instant forest land in a peaceful and open manner with the intention of ownership for not less than 40 years, as of January 1, 1990, more than 20 years passed since January 1, 1990, as of January 1, 1990, as to the entire forest of this case, the acquisition by prescription was completed primarily with respect to the part on board (b) of the instant forest land among the instant forest land, and as of November 24, 2014, D died on November 24, 201, and the Plaintiff was transferred the right to the instant forest from his children,

5) Accordingly, the Defendant is primarily obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on January 1, 1990 with respect to the entire forest of this case primarily to the Plaintiff on the ground of the completion of the prescriptive acquisition on January 1, 1990 with respect to the part on the part on the part on the ship among the forest of this case. 2. According to the results of the survey and appraisal conducted by the first instance court on February 13, 1941, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on December 6, 1940 with respect to the forest of this case on February 13, 194, and the Plaintiff and their family members currently occupy the forest of this case as an orchard or dry field (b) in which trees are cultivated in the part on the ship, and the remainder of the forest of this case are not cultivated by a slope.